Is Operational Data Store as a concept still relavant in today's Informatoin ecosystem?


Hi Fellow Architects -

I was recently reviewing old publications EDW and some of the related concepts such as those of Corporate Information Facotry, Operational BI etc. and came across an old Inmon article from ’98.  I was curious to find out as to whether or not an ODS is relevant in today's landscape where we have EII, EDW Appliances, cloud based Warehousing solutions.

Thanks for tuning in!!
surekha -


Comments

  1. Mike GFebruary 12, 2013 at 10:51 AM

    Even though this article is 14 years old, it still very much applies today. Don't let all the marketing speak from the data warehouse appliances fool anyone, ODS is alive and well, maybe even 'more so' than ever. The only omission I see in this article that should be addressed is that Inmon does not bring up the possibility of having both ODS/Normalized views AND star schema views 'at the same time' - Inmon says its one or the other. This might be Inmon's subtle way of saying there really is no need for Star Schema views, but I disagree - you can actually have both at the same time - I have recommended this, seen this in action and watch it succeeed in multiple places.

    Inmon speaks to the 'Teradata' and data warehouse appliance way - these databases are so highly optimized and massively parallel why bother with burdensome star schemas. I believe the optimal way to do it is by having star schema views (materialized or virtual) based off a normalized foundation via the ODS (which combines the best of the Oracle/Microsoft and the Teradata way, or the best of the Inmon and the Kimball way) - in other words, 'coexistence'. This benefits both explorers AND farmers per the Inmon article and minimizes chances of not properly serving either population.

    Also, I've always called ODS an 'architectural construct' since the days predating this article. Something that business users can't ask for (and one reason why its hard to justify in a business context), but IT folks know its needed to bridge the world of supporting metrics between KTLO operations and business strategy. By calling this an 'architectural structure' in the article, I believe Inmon is saying the same thing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Issues with Server Virtualization

Virtualization has been considered a great way to maximize utilization of server resources by increasing server density. In addition, this concept is considered to be very key to green IT initiatvies as it reduces the number of compute resources needing to be supported in a data center thus reducing the cooling and power costs. Having said that, there seems to be a performance downside to virtualization. Given that a virtual machine (VM) is yet another layer of indirection the server HW this layer negatively impacts the performance any time there is a need for the application to access IO Channels, SAN disc and other network resources. This is especially so when the application code is either running inside of a JVM or an application server container such as a JEE container, .NET CLR or even a web server servlet container. In all cases, performance profiles of an application seem to vary whether the application is running inside of a virtual layer vs. directly on the physical server. V
Read more

Data Aggregation & Data Discovery - Part I

A lot of talk has been heard lately about the concept of data lake.  Variously known as, data refinery, data factory etc.  I find it interesting that we now hear logical architectural terms that speak to the concepts and to the purpose of the big data technologies such as Hadoop / HDFS and Apache distributed database technologies such as HBase / Cassandra .    This may be indicative of a shift.  What I am not sure of is does this mean that there is a level of maturity that has been achieved by this suite of open source technologies? Or could  this point to the fact that these technologies have practical applications that solve enterprise scale problems? Or does it show that enterprises have realized that they are no longer able to just deal with "structured data" and that a vast majority of information lies in the space of "unstructured content" leaving them no choice but to venture into the realm of big data technologies?  Not really sure!   The fact re
Read more

What is the definition of a strategic partnership with a vendor?

In this post I try to outline a few features of what I would consider a strategic partnership with a service provider or a technology vendor.  These are thoughts that I have distilled from years of experience (good and bad) with my vendor partners.  Hence this aspect of doing business cannot be overlook and not the least of these is the "cost" of doing business. Here are a few key attributes, not necessarily in any particular order of preference. 1) the strategic partner relationship has to go beyond a transactional one to that of a more long term one 2) the strategic partner has to have skin in the game - they have to be measured with your success criteria - they can succeed only if you do 3) the strategic partner has to be willing to "share" their technology roadmap with you 4) the strategic partner has to allow you to re-shape their technology roadmap to meet your needs 5) the strategic partner relationship has to include making their test labs, test gear, pr
Read more